![]() ![]() Fortran arrays can, of course, be indexed from 0, indeed from any positive or negative integer within range, but that is really just a convenience for the programmer.Fortran 90 Notes Sources, Types and Control Structures, QUB The Queen's University of Belfastįortran 90 supports two forms of source code the old Fortran 77 source code form (now called fixed form), and the new free form.It may be that some compilers impose a limit to the number of bytes used in a single array, but that is not a point I am making.It is the number of elements which determines the maximum index value required to access an element of an array. ![]() I meant, and still mean, the number of elements, not the number of bytes.Any storage overhead required for an array is tiny compared with the volumes of data you seem to want to work with. Since a double precision value occupies 8 bytes it's relatively easy for you to calculate the maximum bounds of arrays that you are likely to be able to work with. In practice the maximum size of array that you can declare will be limited by the RAM available on your computer. You may find that the maximum size of any dimension of an array is also limited to the same values. In practice you may find that your compiler limits the total number of elements in an array to 2^31-1 or 2^63-1, depending on whether your default integer size is 32- or 64-bits. The Fortran language standards don't define a limit to the size of arrays that a program can (attempt to) declare or allocate. ![]() This is not a compiler specific feature, but there is a fundamental reason for this. Ifort arraysize.f90 -m32 -check -traceback -gįorrtl: severe (179): Cannot allocate array - overflow on array size calculation.Īs expected the size of the array in bytes overflowed and the program crashed long before the indexing variable overflowed. Even if you could somehow compute the address using a Fortran variable wider than the chosen CPU word size, the CPU simply cannot access it.įinally I mad an experiment in Intel Fortran in 32-bit mode with array with 32 byte elements: complex(16), allocatable :: a(:) This is the fundamental reason why 32-bit programs and operating systems cannot address more than 4 GB of memory. The same also holds for the virtual memory addressable by program! And also the memory addressable by the OS and CPU, though they can be 64-bit even if the program is 32-bit. These are both 32-bit or 64-bit on 32-bit and 64-bit programs on modern machines. Also, the size of the array in bytes must fit in a size_t C variable. Of course it must fit to the intptr_t C variable. During array indexing, the address of the element must be calculated. Ok, I will explain by why the number of bytes is limited, not only the element count. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |